MozartV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000264

Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys

Identifieur interne : 000264 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000263; suivant : 000265

Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys

Auteurs : S. Carlson ; P. R M ; D. Artchakov ; L. Linnankoski

Source :

Neuroreport : (Oxford) [ 0959-4965 ] ; 1997.

RBID : Pascal:97-0503845

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude expérimentale, Mémoire travail, Musique, Bruit blanc, Audition, Réponse différée, Distraction, Performance, Comparaison interspécifique, Attention, Stimulus acoustique, Animal, Macaca arctoides, Musique classique.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Acoustic stimulus, Animal, Attention, Delayed response, Distraction, Experimental study, Hearing, Interspecific comparison, Macaca arctoides, Music, Performance, White noise, Working memory.

Abstract

IT has been suggested that Mozart's music may have beneficial effects on the performance of cognitive tasks in humans. In the present study the effects of Mozart's piano music, white noise, simple rhythm and silence were studied on the performance of a delayed response (DR) task in monkeys. The acoustic treatments were given for 15 min, either before or during DR testing. The acoustic treatments did not affect DR performance when given before testing. However, Mozart's piano music played during DR testing caused a significant deterioration in the performance of the monkeys, whereas white noise improved it. It is suggested that Mozart's music serves as distractive stimulation during DR performance thus affecting working-memory-related neuronal processing and performance. White background noise, on the other hand, may improve DR performance by protecting against environmental distraction during testing.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0959-4965`
A03		`1`		`@0 Neuroreport : (Oxf.)`
A05				`@2 8`
A06				`@2 13`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 CARLSON (S.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 RÄMÄ (P.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 ARTCHAKOV (D.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 LINNANKOSKI (L.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki @2 00014, Helsinki @3 FIN @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 2853-2856`
A21				`@1 1997`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 22534 @5 354000069151860100`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 1997 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 17 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 97-0503845`
A60				`@1 P @3 PR`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Neuroreport : (Oxford)`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 IT has been suggested that Mozart's music may have beneficial effects on the performance of cognitive tasks in humans. In the present study the effects of Mozart's piano music, white noise, simple rhythm and silence were studied on the performance of a delayed response (DR) task in monkeys. The acoustic treatments were given for 15 min, either before or during DR testing. The acoustic treatments did not affect DR performance when given before testing. However, Mozart's piano music played during DR testing caused a significant deterioration in the performance of the monkeys, whereas white noise improved it. It is suggested that Mozart's music serves as distractive stimulation during DR performance thus affecting working-memory-related neuronal processing and performance. White background noise, on the other hand, may improve DR performance by protecting against environmental distraction during testing.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26F05B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Experimentelle Untersuchung @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mémoire travail @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Working memory @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Memoria trabajo @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Musique @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Music @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Música @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bruit blanc @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 White noise @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ruido blanco @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Audition @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hearing @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Audición @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réponse différée @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Delayed response @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Respuesta diferida @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Distraction @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Distraction @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Distracción @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Performance @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Performance @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Rendimiento @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Comparaison interspécifique @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Interspecific comparison @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Comparación interespecífica @5 12`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Attention @5 54`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Attention @5 54`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Atención @5 54`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stimulus acoustique @5 55`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Acoustic stimulus @5 55`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estímulo acústico @5 55`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Animal @5 57`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Animal @5 57`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Animal @5 57`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Macaca arctoides @2 NS @5 60`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Macaca arctoides @2 NS @5 60`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Macaca arctoides @2 NS @5 60`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Musique classique @4 INC @5 92`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 23`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 23`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 23`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vigilance @5 26`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vigilance @5 26`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vigilancia @5 26`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception @5 29`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Perception @5 29`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción @5 29`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Simioidea @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Simioidea @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Simioidea @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Primates @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Primates @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Primates @2 NS`
C07	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mammalia @2 NS`
C07	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mammalia @2 NS`
C07	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mammalia @2 NS`
C07	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vertebrata @2 NS`
C07	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vertebrata @2 NS`
C07	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vertebrata @2 NS`
N21				`@1 307`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 97-0503845 INIST
ET :	Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys
AU :	CARLSON (S.); RÄMÄ (P.); ARTCHAKOV (D.); LINNANKOSKI (L.)
AF :	Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki/00014, Helsinki/Finlande (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Papier de recherche; Niveau analytique
SO :	Neuroreport : (Oxford); ISSN 0959-4965; Royaume-Uni; Da. 1997; Vol. 8; No. 13; Pp. 2853-2856; Bibl. 17 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	IT has been suggested that Mozart's music may have beneficial effects on the performance of cognitive tasks in humans. In the present study the effects of Mozart's piano music, white noise, simple rhythm and silence were studied on the performance of a delayed response (DR) task in monkeys. The acoustic treatments were given for 15 min, either before or during DR testing. The acoustic treatments did not affect DR performance when given before testing. However, Mozart's piano music played during DR testing caused a significant deterioration in the performance of the monkeys, whereas white noise improved it. It is suggested that Mozart's music serves as distractive stimulation during DR performance thus affecting working-memory-related neuronal processing and performance. White background noise, on the other hand, may improve DR performance by protecting against environmental distraction during testing.
CC :	002A26F05B
FD :	Etude expérimentale; Mémoire travail; Musique; Bruit blanc; Audition; Réponse différée; Distraction; Performance; Comparaison interspécifique; Attention; Stimulus acoustique; Animal; Macaca arctoides; Musique classique
FG :	Cognition; Vigilance; Perception; Simioidea; Primates; Mammalia; Vertebrata
ED :	Experimental study; Working memory; Music; White noise; Hearing; Delayed response; Distraction; Performance; Interspecific comparison; Attention; Acoustic stimulus; Animal; Macaca arctoides
EG :	Cognition; Vigilance; Perception; Simioidea; Primates; Mammalia; Vertebrata
GD :	Experimentelle Untersuchung
SD :	Estudio experimental; Memoria trabajo; Música; Ruido blanco; Audición; Respuesta diferida; Distracción; Rendimiento; Comparación interespecífica; Atención; Estímulo acústico; Animal; Macaca arctoides
LO :	INIST-22534.354000069151860100
ID :	97-0503845

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:97-0503845

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys</title>
<author><name sortKey="Carlson, S" sort="Carlson, S" uniqKey="Carlson S" first="S." last="Carlson">S. Carlson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="R M, P" sort="R M, P" uniqKey="R M P" first="P." last="R M">P. R M</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Artchakov, D" sort="Artchakov, D" uniqKey="Artchakov D" first="D." last="Artchakov">D. Artchakov</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Linnankoski, L" sort="Linnankoski, L" uniqKey="Linnankoski L" first="L." last="Linnankoski">L. Linnankoski</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">97-0503845</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 97-0503845 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:97-0503845</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000264</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys</title>
<author><name sortKey="Carlson, S" sort="Carlson, S" uniqKey="Carlson S" first="S." last="Carlson">S. Carlson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="R M, P" sort="R M, P" uniqKey="R M P" first="P." last="R M">P. R M</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Artchakov, D" sort="Artchakov, D" uniqKey="Artchakov D" first="D." last="Artchakov">D. Artchakov</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Linnankoski, L" sort="Linnankoski, L" uniqKey="Linnankoski L" first="L." last="Linnankoski">L. Linnankoski</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Neuroreport : (Oxford)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neuroreport : (Oxf.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0959-4965</idno>
<imprint><date when="1997">1997</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Neuroreport : (Oxford)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neuroreport : (Oxf.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0959-4965</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic stimulus</term>
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Attention</term>
<term>Delayed response</term>
<term>Distraction</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Hearing</term>
<term>Interspecific comparison</term>
<term>Macaca arctoides</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Performance</term>
<term>White noise</term>
<term>Working memory</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Mémoire travail</term>
<term>Musique</term>
<term>Bruit blanc</term>
<term>Audition</term>
<term>Réponse différée</term>
<term>Distraction</term>
<term>Performance</term>
<term>Comparaison interspécifique</term>
<term>Attention</term>
<term>Stimulus acoustique</term>
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Macaca arctoides</term>
<term>Musique classique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">IT has been suggested that Mozart's music may have beneficial effects on the performance of cognitive tasks in humans. In the present study the effects of Mozart's piano music, white noise, simple rhythm and silence were studied on the performance of a delayed response (DR) task in monkeys. The acoustic treatments were given for 15 min, either before or during DR testing. The acoustic treatments did not affect DR performance when given before testing. However, Mozart's piano music played during DR testing caused a significant deterioration in the performance of the monkeys, whereas white noise improved it. It is suggested that Mozart's music serves as distractive stimulation during DR performance thus affecting working-memory-related neuronal processing and performance. White background noise, on the other hand, may improve DR performance by protecting against environmental distraction during testing.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0959-4965</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Neuroreport : (Oxf.)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>8</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>13</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>CARLSON (S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RÄMÄ (P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>ARTCHAKOV (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>LINNANKOSKI (L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki</s1>
<s2>00014, Helsinki</s2>
<s3>FIN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>2853-2856</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1997</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>22534</s2>
<s5>354000069151860100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1997 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>17 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>97-0503845</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>PR</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Neuroreport : (Oxford)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>IT has been suggested that Mozart's music may have beneficial effects on the performance of cognitive tasks in humans. In the present study the effects of Mozart's piano music, white noise, simple rhythm and silence were studied on the performance of a delayed response (DR) task in monkeys. The acoustic treatments were given for 15 min, either before or during DR testing. The acoustic treatments did not affect DR performance when given before testing. However, Mozart's piano music played during DR testing caused a significant deterioration in the performance of the monkeys, whereas white noise improved it. It is suggested that Mozart's music serves as distractive stimulation during DR performance thus affecting working-memory-related neuronal processing and performance. White background noise, on the other hand, may improve DR performance by protecting against environmental distraction during testing.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26F05B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Experimentelle Untersuchung</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mémoire travail</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Working memory</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Memoria trabajo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Musique</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Music</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Música</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bruit blanc</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>White noise</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ruido blanco</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Audition</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hearing</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Audición</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réponse différée</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Delayed response</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Respuesta diferida</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Distraction</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Distraction</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Distracción</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Performance</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Performance</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rendimiento</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Comparaison interspécifique</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Interspecific comparison</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Comparación interespecífica</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Attention</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Attention</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Atención</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stimulus acoustique</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acoustic stimulus</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estímulo acústico</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>57</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>57</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>57</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Macaca arctoides</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>60</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Macaca arctoides</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>60</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Macaca arctoides</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>60</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Musique classique</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>92</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vigilance</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vigilance</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vigilancia</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Simioidea</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Simioidea</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Simioidea</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Primates</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Primates</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Primates</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>307</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 97-0503845 INIST</NO>
<ET>Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys</ET>
<AU>CARLSON (S.); RÄMÄ (P.); ARTCHAKOV (D.); LINNANKOSKI (L.)</AU>
<AF>Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Physiology, PO Box 9, University of Helsinki/00014, Helsinki/Finlande (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Papier de recherche; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Neuroreport : (Oxford); ISSN 0959-4965; Royaume-Uni; Da. 1997; Vol. 8; No. 13; Pp. 2853-2856; Bibl. 17 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>IT has been suggested that Mozart's music may have beneficial effects on the performance of cognitive tasks in humans. In the present study the effects of Mozart's piano music, white noise, simple rhythm and silence were studied on the performance of a delayed response (DR) task in monkeys. The acoustic treatments were given for 15 min, either before or during DR testing. The acoustic treatments did not affect DR performance when given before testing. However, Mozart's piano music played during DR testing caused a significant deterioration in the performance of the monkeys, whereas white noise improved it. It is suggested that Mozart's music serves as distractive stimulation during DR performance thus affecting working-memory-related neuronal processing and performance. White background noise, on the other hand, may improve DR performance by protecting against environmental distraction during testing.</EA>
<CC>002A26F05B</CC>
<FD>Etude expérimentale; Mémoire travail; Musique; Bruit blanc; Audition; Réponse différée; Distraction; Performance; Comparaison interspécifique; Attention; Stimulus acoustique; Animal; Macaca arctoides; Musique classique</FD>
<FG>Cognition; Vigilance; Perception; Simioidea; Primates; Mammalia; Vertebrata</FG>
<ED>Experimental study; Working memory; Music; White noise; Hearing; Delayed response; Distraction; Performance; Interspecific comparison; Attention; Acoustic stimulus; Animal; Macaca arctoides</ED>
<EG>Cognition; Vigilance; Perception; Simioidea; Primates; Mammalia; Vertebrata</EG>
<GD>Experimentelle Untersuchung</GD>
<SD>Estudio experimental; Memoria trabajo; Música; Ruido blanco; Audición; Respuesta diferida; Distracción; Rendimiento; Comparación interespecífica; Atención; Estímulo acústico; Animal; Macaca arctoides</SD>
<LO>INIST-22534.354000069151860100</LO>
<ID>97-0503845</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000264 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000264 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MozartV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:97-0503845
   |texte=   Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20.
Data generation: Sun Apr 10 15:06:14 2016. Site generation: Tue Feb 7 15:40:35 2023

	Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart

Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys

Effects of music and white noise on working memory performance in monkeys

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri